Data centers in France: Is there a greater shortage of leaders than capital?
Data centers in France: Is there a greater shortage of leaders than capital?
Data centers in France: Is there a greater shortage of leaders than capital?
Share
In eighteen months, France has accumulated announcements of investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure that no one would have imagined in 2024. 109 billion euros promised at the AI summit in February 2025. 93 billion euros of commitments at the Choose France summit in June 2026, a record, largely driven by data centers.
Money is no longer the constraint. The electrical grid has become one, and behind it, a resource that is spoken of much less: leaders capable of transforming an announcement into a connected, built, and operated site.
Figures to Know
Indicator | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
Private investments announced at the AI summit, February 2025 | 109 billion euros | Presidency of the Republic, franceinfo |
Commitments announced at the Choose France summit, June 1, 2026 | 93 billion euros, record for the event | Élysée, Bpifrance |
SoftBank project in France | up to 75 billion euros for 5 GW, including an initial phase of 45 billion for 3.1 GW by 2031 | SoftBank Group, press release |
Power reserved by data center projects | nearly 18 GW, for about 80 projects | RTE, May 2026 |
Of which Île-de-France and Hauts-de-France | about 7 GW and 6 GW | RTE |
Data centers in service in France | about 300 | RTE |
Share of connection requests made by European operators | 1.4 GW out of 15 GW identified | Banque des Territoires |
Data center consumption | about 10 TWh per year, or 2% of French consumption | RTE |
Projected consumption | 15 to 20 TWh in 2030, 23 to 28 TWh in 2035 | RTE |
Delay to reach 80% of reserved power | 10 to 15 years | RTE |
Why this topic is pressing now
The Choose France summit on June 1, 2026, marked a change of scale. SoftBank's project alone plans for up to 75 billion euros and 5 GW of capacity in the Hauts-de-France region, across three sites: Loon-Plage near Dunkirk, Bosquel, and Bouchain, in partnership with Schneider Electric and EDF.
These amounts grab attention. RTE's data tells another story, which is more useful for those who must make decisions.
Nearly 18 GW of power is reserved by about 80 projects. But data centers connected two or three years ago only use about 20% of the power they had requested today. And RTE estimates that it will take ten to fifteen years to reach 80% of the reserved power, because equipment is installed at the pace of actual usage.
In other words, the announcement is a starting point. Connection, construction, and scaling up take a decade. It is during this decade that the success or failure of each project is determined, and it is played out on the level of individuals.
What the nationality of project promoters reveals
A figure from the Banque des Territoires sums up the situation: out of 15 GW of identified connection requests, only 1.4 GW are made by European operators.
The majority of projects are therefore led by foreign actors—American, Asian, or from the Gulf—who arrive in France with capital, technical expertise, and a schedule. What they do not bring is local knowledge of the French landscape: the operation of the electricity transmission network, urban planning procedures, relations with local elected officials, administrative delays, and expectations regarding social acceptability.
This knowledge cannot be bought along with the land. It is embodied in the leaders that the operator recruits to manage its establishment.
The bottleneck is no longer financial
The Banque des Territoires states it bluntly: connection to the electrical grid has become the main constraint. Added to this are land availability, the management of water and produced heat, and acceptance by local populations.
None of these constraints can be lifted by additional investment. Each must be negotiated, with a grid operator, a prefecture, an intercommunality, or local residents. A data center project in France is, during its first years, more of an exercise in negotiation and territorial development than a technical construction site.
This is where the profile of the leaders becomes decisive, and this is where operators most often make mistakes.
The leadership roles that decide the fate of a project
Role | What they carry | Where the profiles are found |
|---|---|---|
France Director or Country Manager | The operator's credibility with public authorities, arbitration between headquarters' schedule and local reality | Energy, large infrastructure, established colocation operators |
Development Directorate | Land, permits, relations with local authorities | Logistics or industrial real estate development, renewable energy |
Energy and Grid Connection Directorate | Dialogue with RTE, supply contracts, securing power capacity | Grid operators, electricity producers, renewable energy developers |
Construction Directorate | On-time delivery, control of the supply chain for critical equipment | Large construction groups, industrial engineering |
Operations Directorate | Site availability, security, scaling up | Existing data center operators, high-availability industry |
Territorial Impact Directorate | Water, waste heat recovery, local acceptability | Local authorities, energy companies, industry subject to environmental authorization |
The common thread of these roles: none is an IT role. The best profiles come from energy, infrastructure, and industry, not from digital technology.
The first Country Manager, the riskiest decision
For a foreign operator, the first recruitment in France conditions all subsequent ones. This is the person who will represent the company before the administration, who will recruit the local team, and who will arbitrate between the headquarters' demands and the constraints of the field.
Three qualities distinguish successful profiles in this role:
Established institutional credibility. Dialogue with a grid operator or a prefecture cannot be built in a few months. It relies on a history, known interlocutors, and a reputation.
The ability to say no to headquarters. A schedule set abroad, without knowledge of French timeframes, must be challenged early. A leader who promises headquarters what the field does not allow wastes more time than they save.
A political reading of the territory. A project of several hundred megawatts transforms a municipality. Elected officials, residents, and local economic actors each have a position that must be understood before it hardens.
Why these profiles are rare
The talent pool is narrow for a simple reason: France has never needed many large-scale data center leaders. Existing sites are, for the most part, medium-sized infrastructures. The projects announced since 2025 belong to another category, comparable to major industrial sites.
The leaders who have managed projects of this size, with a high-voltage connection, a multi-billion euro investment, and high public exposure, are found mainly in energy, nuclear, major transport infrastructure, and heavy industry. They do not spontaneously present themselves in the digital market, and many do not imagine that their experience is transferable.
Executive search must therefore go and find them outside their sector, and present them with a project whose stakes they understand. It is a work of direct approach in the strictest sense.
Frequent errors
Recruiting an IT profile to manage an infrastructure project. An excellent Chief Information Officer does not necessarily have experience with a project of several hundred megawatts or an environmental permit procedure. The data center is an industrial asset before it is a digital asset.
Importing a leader from headquarters without a local relay. An experienced expatriate knows the company, not the French administration. Without a number two strongly anchored locally, they discover delays rather than anticipating them.
Recruiting after securing the land. The France Director should participate in the choice of the site. Land chosen without a prior assessment of grid connection or local acceptability can block a project for years.
Confusing announcement and execution. The commitments presented at Choose France remain, as several analyses remind us, dependent on their concrete implementation. An operator that staffs its project at the pace of communication rather than the pace of the field over-dimensions too early or under-dimensions too late.
Underestimating acceptability. Water, heat, land, and local employment have become subjects of public debate. A project without a leader capable of defending them before a population is exposed to legal challenges that cost more than recruitment.
How to evaluate an implementation leader
Have they already led a project connected to the high-voltage grid? Ask for the actual delay between request and power-on, and what slowed it down.
Which institutional interlocutors do they know personally? At the grid operator, within State services, in the local authorities of the targeted region.
Have they already defended a project contested locally? The story of the public consultation says more than the story of the construction site.
How did they manage a schedule disagreement with a foreign headquarters? This is the situation they will face in the first six months.
Can they build a local team quickly? Their network counts as much as their personal experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much investment has been announced in data centers in France? 109 billion euros of private investment were announced at the AI summit in February 2025. At the Choose France summit on June 1, 2026, 93 billion euros of commitments were presented, a record, including SoftBank's project which plans up to 75 billion euros for 5 GW of capacity in the Hauts-de-France region.
What is the main constraint for data center projects in France? Connection to the electrical grid. Nearly 18 GW of power is reserved by about 80 projects according to RTE, and the Banque des Territoires identifies connection as the main constraint, ahead of land, water, and local acceptability.
Why are data center leaders hard to recruit? Because the projects announced since 2025 are of a scale that France has never known in this sector. Leaders who have experience with comparable projects, connected to high voltage and publicly exposed, come mainly from energy, major infrastructure, and heavy industry, not from digital technology.
What profile should be recruited as the first France Director of a foreign operator? A profile with established institutional credibility, capable of challenging a schedule set by headquarters, and possessing a political reading of local territories. Technical experience matters, but the ability to negotiate with the grid, administration, and elected officials decides the success.
Will data centers consume a lot of electricity in France? About 10 TWh per year today, or 2% of French consumption according to RTE. The grid operator projects 15 to 20 TWh in 2030 and 23 to 28 TWh in 2035. The ramp-up is progressive: sites connected two or three years ago only use about 20% of the requested power.
When should the leader of a data center project be recruited? Before the final choice of site. Land selected without an evaluation of connection and local acceptability can block a project for years. The France Director must participate in this decision, not inherit it.
Key Takeaways
France recorded 109 billion euros in announcements in February 2025 and 93 billion in commitments at Choose France in June 2026, with data centers in the front row.
Nearly 18 GW are reserved on the grid, but it will take ten to fifteen years to use 80% of it. The announcement is only the beginning.
Only 1.4 GW out of 15 GW of requests are made by European operators. Foreign players need leaders who know the French landscape.
Decisive roles belong to energy, territorial development, and industry, not IT.
The first France Director is the riskiest decision, and it must precede the choice of the site.
Laroze Partners' Perspective
The public debate on data centers focuses on billions, gigawatts, and sovereignty. It rarely focuses on the people who will have to spend ten years moving these projects from announcement to operation.
Yet that is where the real bottleneck lies. An operator can raise capital in a few weeks. It cannot buy the trust of a grid operator, knowledge of an authorization procedure, or credibility with a city council in a few weeks.
The projects that succeed will not necessarily be the best-funded. They will be those that have found, early on, leaders capable of holding the ground.
In eighteen months, France has accumulated announcements of investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure that no one would have imagined in 2024. 109 billion euros promised at the AI summit in February 2025. 93 billion euros of commitments at the Choose France summit in June 2026, a record, largely driven by data centers.
Money is no longer the constraint. The electrical grid has become one, and behind it, a resource that is spoken of much less: leaders capable of transforming an announcement into a connected, built, and operated site.
Figures to Know
Indicator | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
Private investments announced at the AI summit, February 2025 | 109 billion euros | Presidency of the Republic, franceinfo |
Commitments announced at the Choose France summit, June 1, 2026 | 93 billion euros, record for the event | Élysée, Bpifrance |
SoftBank project in France | up to 75 billion euros for 5 GW, including an initial phase of 45 billion for 3.1 GW by 2031 | SoftBank Group, press release |
Power reserved by data center projects | nearly 18 GW, for about 80 projects | RTE, May 2026 |
Of which Île-de-France and Hauts-de-France | about 7 GW and 6 GW | RTE |
Data centers in service in France | about 300 | RTE |
Share of connection requests made by European operators | 1.4 GW out of 15 GW identified | Banque des Territoires |
Data center consumption | about 10 TWh per year, or 2% of French consumption | RTE |
Projected consumption | 15 to 20 TWh in 2030, 23 to 28 TWh in 2035 | RTE |
Delay to reach 80% of reserved power | 10 to 15 years | RTE |
Why this topic is pressing now
The Choose France summit on June 1, 2026, marked a change of scale. SoftBank's project alone plans for up to 75 billion euros and 5 GW of capacity in the Hauts-de-France region, across three sites: Loon-Plage near Dunkirk, Bosquel, and Bouchain, in partnership with Schneider Electric and EDF.
These amounts grab attention. RTE's data tells another story, which is more useful for those who must make decisions.
Nearly 18 GW of power is reserved by about 80 projects. But data centers connected two or three years ago only use about 20% of the power they had requested today. And RTE estimates that it will take ten to fifteen years to reach 80% of the reserved power, because equipment is installed at the pace of actual usage.
In other words, the announcement is a starting point. Connection, construction, and scaling up take a decade. It is during this decade that the success or failure of each project is determined, and it is played out on the level of individuals.
What the nationality of project promoters reveals
A figure from the Banque des Territoires sums up the situation: out of 15 GW of identified connection requests, only 1.4 GW are made by European operators.
The majority of projects are therefore led by foreign actors—American, Asian, or from the Gulf—who arrive in France with capital, technical expertise, and a schedule. What they do not bring is local knowledge of the French landscape: the operation of the electricity transmission network, urban planning procedures, relations with local elected officials, administrative delays, and expectations regarding social acceptability.
This knowledge cannot be bought along with the land. It is embodied in the leaders that the operator recruits to manage its establishment.
The bottleneck is no longer financial
The Banque des Territoires states it bluntly: connection to the electrical grid has become the main constraint. Added to this are land availability, the management of water and produced heat, and acceptance by local populations.
None of these constraints can be lifted by additional investment. Each must be negotiated, with a grid operator, a prefecture, an intercommunality, or local residents. A data center project in France is, during its first years, more of an exercise in negotiation and territorial development than a technical construction site.
This is where the profile of the leaders becomes decisive, and this is where operators most often make mistakes.
The leadership roles that decide the fate of a project
Role | What they carry | Where the profiles are found |
|---|---|---|
France Director or Country Manager | The operator's credibility with public authorities, arbitration between headquarters' schedule and local reality | Energy, large infrastructure, established colocation operators |
Development Directorate | Land, permits, relations with local authorities | Logistics or industrial real estate development, renewable energy |
Energy and Grid Connection Directorate | Dialogue with RTE, supply contracts, securing power capacity | Grid operators, electricity producers, renewable energy developers |
Construction Directorate | On-time delivery, control of the supply chain for critical equipment | Large construction groups, industrial engineering |
Operations Directorate | Site availability, security, scaling up | Existing data center operators, high-availability industry |
Territorial Impact Directorate | Water, waste heat recovery, local acceptability | Local authorities, energy companies, industry subject to environmental authorization |
The common thread of these roles: none is an IT role. The best profiles come from energy, infrastructure, and industry, not from digital technology.
The first Country Manager, the riskiest decision
For a foreign operator, the first recruitment in France conditions all subsequent ones. This is the person who will represent the company before the administration, who will recruit the local team, and who will arbitrate between the headquarters' demands and the constraints of the field.
Three qualities distinguish successful profiles in this role:
Established institutional credibility. Dialogue with a grid operator or a prefecture cannot be built in a few months. It relies on a history, known interlocutors, and a reputation.
The ability to say no to headquarters. A schedule set abroad, without knowledge of French timeframes, must be challenged early. A leader who promises headquarters what the field does not allow wastes more time than they save.
A political reading of the territory. A project of several hundred megawatts transforms a municipality. Elected officials, residents, and local economic actors each have a position that must be understood before it hardens.
Why these profiles are rare
The talent pool is narrow for a simple reason: France has never needed many large-scale data center leaders. Existing sites are, for the most part, medium-sized infrastructures. The projects announced since 2025 belong to another category, comparable to major industrial sites.
The leaders who have managed projects of this size, with a high-voltage connection, a multi-billion euro investment, and high public exposure, are found mainly in energy, nuclear, major transport infrastructure, and heavy industry. They do not spontaneously present themselves in the digital market, and many do not imagine that their experience is transferable.
Executive search must therefore go and find them outside their sector, and present them with a project whose stakes they understand. It is a work of direct approach in the strictest sense.
Frequent errors
Recruiting an IT profile to manage an infrastructure project. An excellent Chief Information Officer does not necessarily have experience with a project of several hundred megawatts or an environmental permit procedure. The data center is an industrial asset before it is a digital asset.
Importing a leader from headquarters without a local relay. An experienced expatriate knows the company, not the French administration. Without a number two strongly anchored locally, they discover delays rather than anticipating them.
Recruiting after securing the land. The France Director should participate in the choice of the site. Land chosen without a prior assessment of grid connection or local acceptability can block a project for years.
Confusing announcement and execution. The commitments presented at Choose France remain, as several analyses remind us, dependent on their concrete implementation. An operator that staffs its project at the pace of communication rather than the pace of the field over-dimensions too early or under-dimensions too late.
Underestimating acceptability. Water, heat, land, and local employment have become subjects of public debate. A project without a leader capable of defending them before a population is exposed to legal challenges that cost more than recruitment.
How to evaluate an implementation leader
Have they already led a project connected to the high-voltage grid? Ask for the actual delay between request and power-on, and what slowed it down.
Which institutional interlocutors do they know personally? At the grid operator, within State services, in the local authorities of the targeted region.
Have they already defended a project contested locally? The story of the public consultation says more than the story of the construction site.
How did they manage a schedule disagreement with a foreign headquarters? This is the situation they will face in the first six months.
Can they build a local team quickly? Their network counts as much as their personal experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much investment has been announced in data centers in France? 109 billion euros of private investment were announced at the AI summit in February 2025. At the Choose France summit on June 1, 2026, 93 billion euros of commitments were presented, a record, including SoftBank's project which plans up to 75 billion euros for 5 GW of capacity in the Hauts-de-France region.
What is the main constraint for data center projects in France? Connection to the electrical grid. Nearly 18 GW of power is reserved by about 80 projects according to RTE, and the Banque des Territoires identifies connection as the main constraint, ahead of land, water, and local acceptability.
Why are data center leaders hard to recruit? Because the projects announced since 2025 are of a scale that France has never known in this sector. Leaders who have experience with comparable projects, connected to high voltage and publicly exposed, come mainly from energy, major infrastructure, and heavy industry, not from digital technology.
What profile should be recruited as the first France Director of a foreign operator? A profile with established institutional credibility, capable of challenging a schedule set by headquarters, and possessing a political reading of local territories. Technical experience matters, but the ability to negotiate with the grid, administration, and elected officials decides the success.
Will data centers consume a lot of electricity in France? About 10 TWh per year today, or 2% of French consumption according to RTE. The grid operator projects 15 to 20 TWh in 2030 and 23 to 28 TWh in 2035. The ramp-up is progressive: sites connected two or three years ago only use about 20% of the requested power.
When should the leader of a data center project be recruited? Before the final choice of site. Land selected without an evaluation of connection and local acceptability can block a project for years. The France Director must participate in this decision, not inherit it.
Key Takeaways
France recorded 109 billion euros in announcements in February 2025 and 93 billion in commitments at Choose France in June 2026, with data centers in the front row.
Nearly 18 GW are reserved on the grid, but it will take ten to fifteen years to use 80% of it. The announcement is only the beginning.
Only 1.4 GW out of 15 GW of requests are made by European operators. Foreign players need leaders who know the French landscape.
Decisive roles belong to energy, territorial development, and industry, not IT.
The first France Director is the riskiest decision, and it must precede the choice of the site.
Laroze Partners' Perspective
The public debate on data centers focuses on billions, gigawatts, and sovereignty. It rarely focuses on the people who will have to spend ten years moving these projects from announcement to operation.
Yet that is where the real bottleneck lies. An operator can raise capital in a few weeks. It cannot buy the trust of a grid operator, knowledge of an authorization procedure, or credibility with a city council in a few weeks.
The projects that succeed will not necessarily be the best-funded. They will be those that have found, early on, leaders capable of holding the ground.
In eighteen months, France has accumulated announcements of investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure that no one would have imagined in 2024. 109 billion euros promised at the AI summit in February 2025. 93 billion euros of commitments at the Choose France summit in June 2026, a record, largely driven by data centers.
Money is no longer the constraint. The electrical grid has become one, and behind it, a resource that is spoken of much less: leaders capable of transforming an announcement into a connected, built, and operated site.
Figures to Know
Indicator | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
Private investments announced at the AI summit, February 2025 | 109 billion euros | Presidency of the Republic, franceinfo |
Commitments announced at the Choose France summit, June 1, 2026 | 93 billion euros, record for the event | Élysée, Bpifrance |
SoftBank project in France | up to 75 billion euros for 5 GW, including an initial phase of 45 billion for 3.1 GW by 2031 | SoftBank Group, press release |
Power reserved by data center projects | nearly 18 GW, for about 80 projects | RTE, May 2026 |
Of which Île-de-France and Hauts-de-France | about 7 GW and 6 GW | RTE |
Data centers in service in France | about 300 | RTE |
Share of connection requests made by European operators | 1.4 GW out of 15 GW identified | Banque des Territoires |
Data center consumption | about 10 TWh per year, or 2% of French consumption | RTE |
Projected consumption | 15 to 20 TWh in 2030, 23 to 28 TWh in 2035 | RTE |
Delay to reach 80% of reserved power | 10 to 15 years | RTE |
Why this topic is pressing now
The Choose France summit on June 1, 2026, marked a change of scale. SoftBank's project alone plans for up to 75 billion euros and 5 GW of capacity in the Hauts-de-France region, across three sites: Loon-Plage near Dunkirk, Bosquel, and Bouchain, in partnership with Schneider Electric and EDF.
These amounts grab attention. RTE's data tells another story, which is more useful for those who must make decisions.
Nearly 18 GW of power is reserved by about 80 projects. But data centers connected two or three years ago only use about 20% of the power they had requested today. And RTE estimates that it will take ten to fifteen years to reach 80% of the reserved power, because equipment is installed at the pace of actual usage.
In other words, the announcement is a starting point. Connection, construction, and scaling up take a decade. It is during this decade that the success or failure of each project is determined, and it is played out on the level of individuals.
What the nationality of project promoters reveals
A figure from the Banque des Territoires sums up the situation: out of 15 GW of identified connection requests, only 1.4 GW are made by European operators.
The majority of projects are therefore led by foreign actors—American, Asian, or from the Gulf—who arrive in France with capital, technical expertise, and a schedule. What they do not bring is local knowledge of the French landscape: the operation of the electricity transmission network, urban planning procedures, relations with local elected officials, administrative delays, and expectations regarding social acceptability.
This knowledge cannot be bought along with the land. It is embodied in the leaders that the operator recruits to manage its establishment.
The bottleneck is no longer financial
The Banque des Territoires states it bluntly: connection to the electrical grid has become the main constraint. Added to this are land availability, the management of water and produced heat, and acceptance by local populations.
None of these constraints can be lifted by additional investment. Each must be negotiated, with a grid operator, a prefecture, an intercommunality, or local residents. A data center project in France is, during its first years, more of an exercise in negotiation and territorial development than a technical construction site.
This is where the profile of the leaders becomes decisive, and this is where operators most often make mistakes.
The leadership roles that decide the fate of a project
Role | What they carry | Where the profiles are found |
|---|---|---|
France Director or Country Manager | The operator's credibility with public authorities, arbitration between headquarters' schedule and local reality | Energy, large infrastructure, established colocation operators |
Development Directorate | Land, permits, relations with local authorities | Logistics or industrial real estate development, renewable energy |
Energy and Grid Connection Directorate | Dialogue with RTE, supply contracts, securing power capacity | Grid operators, electricity producers, renewable energy developers |
Construction Directorate | On-time delivery, control of the supply chain for critical equipment | Large construction groups, industrial engineering |
Operations Directorate | Site availability, security, scaling up | Existing data center operators, high-availability industry |
Territorial Impact Directorate | Water, waste heat recovery, local acceptability | Local authorities, energy companies, industry subject to environmental authorization |
The common thread of these roles: none is an IT role. The best profiles come from energy, infrastructure, and industry, not from digital technology.
The first Country Manager, the riskiest decision
For a foreign operator, the first recruitment in France conditions all subsequent ones. This is the person who will represent the company before the administration, who will recruit the local team, and who will arbitrate between the headquarters' demands and the constraints of the field.
Three qualities distinguish successful profiles in this role:
Established institutional credibility. Dialogue with a grid operator or a prefecture cannot be built in a few months. It relies on a history, known interlocutors, and a reputation.
The ability to say no to headquarters. A schedule set abroad, without knowledge of French timeframes, must be challenged early. A leader who promises headquarters what the field does not allow wastes more time than they save.
A political reading of the territory. A project of several hundred megawatts transforms a municipality. Elected officials, residents, and local economic actors each have a position that must be understood before it hardens.
Why these profiles are rare
The talent pool is narrow for a simple reason: France has never needed many large-scale data center leaders. Existing sites are, for the most part, medium-sized infrastructures. The projects announced since 2025 belong to another category, comparable to major industrial sites.
The leaders who have managed projects of this size, with a high-voltage connection, a multi-billion euro investment, and high public exposure, are found mainly in energy, nuclear, major transport infrastructure, and heavy industry. They do not spontaneously present themselves in the digital market, and many do not imagine that their experience is transferable.
Executive search must therefore go and find them outside their sector, and present them with a project whose stakes they understand. It is a work of direct approach in the strictest sense.
Frequent errors
Recruiting an IT profile to manage an infrastructure project. An excellent Chief Information Officer does not necessarily have experience with a project of several hundred megawatts or an environmental permit procedure. The data center is an industrial asset before it is a digital asset.
Importing a leader from headquarters without a local relay. An experienced expatriate knows the company, not the French administration. Without a number two strongly anchored locally, they discover delays rather than anticipating them.
Recruiting after securing the land. The France Director should participate in the choice of the site. Land chosen without a prior assessment of grid connection or local acceptability can block a project for years.
Confusing announcement and execution. The commitments presented at Choose France remain, as several analyses remind us, dependent on their concrete implementation. An operator that staffs its project at the pace of communication rather than the pace of the field over-dimensions too early or under-dimensions too late.
Underestimating acceptability. Water, heat, land, and local employment have become subjects of public debate. A project without a leader capable of defending them before a population is exposed to legal challenges that cost more than recruitment.
How to evaluate an implementation leader
Have they already led a project connected to the high-voltage grid? Ask for the actual delay between request and power-on, and what slowed it down.
Which institutional interlocutors do they know personally? At the grid operator, within State services, in the local authorities of the targeted region.
Have they already defended a project contested locally? The story of the public consultation says more than the story of the construction site.
How did they manage a schedule disagreement with a foreign headquarters? This is the situation they will face in the first six months.
Can they build a local team quickly? Their network counts as much as their personal experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much investment has been announced in data centers in France? 109 billion euros of private investment were announced at the AI summit in February 2025. At the Choose France summit on June 1, 2026, 93 billion euros of commitments were presented, a record, including SoftBank's project which plans up to 75 billion euros for 5 GW of capacity in the Hauts-de-France region.
What is the main constraint for data center projects in France? Connection to the electrical grid. Nearly 18 GW of power is reserved by about 80 projects according to RTE, and the Banque des Territoires identifies connection as the main constraint, ahead of land, water, and local acceptability.
Why are data center leaders hard to recruit? Because the projects announced since 2025 are of a scale that France has never known in this sector. Leaders who have experience with comparable projects, connected to high voltage and publicly exposed, come mainly from energy, major infrastructure, and heavy industry, not from digital technology.
What profile should be recruited as the first France Director of a foreign operator? A profile with established institutional credibility, capable of challenging a schedule set by headquarters, and possessing a political reading of local territories. Technical experience matters, but the ability to negotiate with the grid, administration, and elected officials decides the success.
Will data centers consume a lot of electricity in France? About 10 TWh per year today, or 2% of French consumption according to RTE. The grid operator projects 15 to 20 TWh in 2030 and 23 to 28 TWh in 2035. The ramp-up is progressive: sites connected two or three years ago only use about 20% of the requested power.
When should the leader of a data center project be recruited? Before the final choice of site. Land selected without an evaluation of connection and local acceptability can block a project for years. The France Director must participate in this decision, not inherit it.
Key Takeaways
France recorded 109 billion euros in announcements in February 2025 and 93 billion in commitments at Choose France in June 2026, with data centers in the front row.
Nearly 18 GW are reserved on the grid, but it will take ten to fifteen years to use 80% of it. The announcement is only the beginning.
Only 1.4 GW out of 15 GW of requests are made by European operators. Foreign players need leaders who know the French landscape.
Decisive roles belong to energy, territorial development, and industry, not IT.
The first France Director is the riskiest decision, and it must precede the choice of the site.
Laroze Partners' Perspective
The public debate on data centers focuses on billions, gigawatts, and sovereignty. It rarely focuses on the people who will have to spend ten years moving these projects from announcement to operation.
Yet that is where the real bottleneck lies. An operator can raise capital in a few weeks. It cannot buy the trust of a grid operator, knowledge of an authorization procedure, or credibility with a city council in a few weeks.
The projects that succeed will not necessarily be the best-funded. They will be those that have found, early on, leaders capable of holding the ground.
See more
See more
Economic sovereignty: recruiting the leaders who make a difference
Economic sovereignty: recruiting the leaders who make a difference
IT Services Companies and AI: The Leadership Challenge Transforming the Model
IT Services Companies and AI: The Leadership Challenge Transforming the Model
Chief GenIA Officer: The leader of transformation through generative AI
Chief GenIA Officer: The leader of transformation through generative AI
Accompanying a recruited executive: the key to their first year
Accompanying a recruited executive: the key to their first year
Data centers in France: Is there a greater shortage of leaders than capital?
Data centers in France: Is there a greater shortage of leaders than capital?
CONTACT
Let's talk about your next recruitment
Outline your needs in a few lines. Your request will be treated with the strictest confidentiality.
CONTACT
Let's talk about your next recruitment
Outline your needs in a few lines. Your request will be treated with the strictest confidentiality.
CONTACT
Let's talk about your next recruitment
Outline your needs in a few lines. Your request will be treated with the strictest confidentiality.
